Monthly Archives: February 2013

A Fable of Women in the Law

Tabitha Ann Holton’s story should be a movie. The only problem would be restraint. It’s the Zero Dark Thirty and Argo problem. Should factual accuracy stand in the way of fabulism?

Tabitha Ann Holton

Tabitha Ann Holton

The South’s first woman lawyer, Tabitha Holton, was the child of religious dissenters who settled in central North Carolina. Her father was “read out” of his Quaker meeting. He was educated as a lawyer but became a Methodist Protestant minister. Ultimately, he was too outspoken even for that anti-hierarchical and anti-slavery denomination and he led in forming an even more radical one.

Tabitha was educated at Greensboro Academy. She watched as her brothers studied law and then, in January 1878, she applied for a license herself, alongside her brother Samuel. But, the relevant North Carolina statute limited the practice of law to “persons” and so there was a controversy about whether that term included women.

At the time, only six states had admitted women to practice law, and roughly a dozen women had been licensed in the entire country. None in North Carolina; none in the South.

North Carolina’s Supreme Court asked for oral argument. The newspapers took up the issue. Iconic figures aligned on each side: William Horn Battle  for tradition vs. Albion Tourgée for Tabitha.

Battle was the archetypical Southern CONSERVATIVE; Tourgée, the RADICAL. Tradition vs. change. What price progress?

William Horn Battle

William Horn Battle

Battle was a Confederate planter raised in Edgecombe County in the East. He had been a judge and Supreme Court justice, a cotton mill owner, banker, high church Episcopalian, scholar and founder of the UNC law school. He was a mighty defender of common law pleading.

Tourgée was a Yankee and former Union Army officer who had moved south after the war to Guilford County in the Piedmont. He was reviled as a carpetbagger and had recently relocated from Greensboro to Raleigh in order to escape the rancor of Greensboro’s white community. He was a failed manufacturer and nurseryman, a respected legal scholar, a founder of the North Carolina Republican Party, a popular author, a judge, the principal draftsman of North Carolina’s Constitution of 1868 and a crusader for racial justice – the originator of the phrase “color blind justice” and plaintiff’s counsel in Plessy v. Ferguson. He championed Code pleading.

Battle blasted: “No Southern lady should be permitted to sully her sweetness by breathing the pestiferous air of the courtroom.”

The Greensboro Patriot rejoined: “Blast the prejudice that puts women down as only fit to be men’s playthings!”

Albion Tourgee

Albion Tourgee

In the end, Tourgée mounted a compelling argument in which he cited persuasive points and authorities, including Battle’s own legal treatise.

At the center of the swirling controversy was a demure but determined Quaker/Methodist maid – one who knew the law cold. Bar exams at that time were conducted orally by Supreme Court justices. Tabitha aced hers.

The Court ruled on the spot that she should be licensed. Tabitha marched home to Guilford County, then off in triumph to private practice in partnership with her brother in Dobson. The sun set slowly over the hills of western Surry County.

But wait. There is an epilogue. Tabitha practiced law only for eight years before she succumbed to tuberculosis at age 33.  After her death, a handbill was distributed in Dobson. In part, it read:

Tabitha A. Holton, noble daughter,

Rest thou in thy immortal triumph. The power of thy genius has broken the iron bands of brutality which had been rivited [sic] for ages upon thy sex. No more can the barbed shaft of prejudice and envy reach thee in thy eternal repose. Thy genius stripped DEATH of all terror.

First in all the Sunny South to claim, and obtain, the full rights of womanhood. Death has crowned thy works; but a short space of time did eternity allot for thy mortality.

Tabitha was returned to Guilford County and laid to rest with her family in the cemetery at Springfield Meeting House. Her headstone reads, “Granted license in practicing law by the Supreme Court of N.C., January Term 1878, Died June 14, 1886.”

* * * *

Almost every detail set out above is factually accurate. The principal variance is that while William Horn Battle is acknowledged to have opposed Tabitha’s admission and made the statement quoted above, there is no confirmation that he was present at Tourgée’s argument before the Supreme Court. (See the Kelley Harris paper, Tabitha Anne Holton: First in North Carolina, First in the South  for  what can be confirmed.)

But this is after all, a fable – of tradition, change, and the role and status of women.

And, there is a broader point to be made: that, burdened by the weight of centuries of tradition and beset by towering cultural archetypes, Tabitha was a hero; and the legal profession provided the characters, the instruments and the path for her quest.

Major social change was achieved by moving from a general principle to its application in new circumstances. The way forward was guided by relevant points and authorities; and, ultimately, the victory was won by Tabitha’s unquestioned qualifications on the merits of her particular case.

A fable, I say. And a movie.

It Started Here

Mod Meals on Mendenhall

Mod Meals on Mendenhall

Can’t comment much more than to provide this link and the observation that it all started here.

The Mod Meals post republishes something that was also in the Greensboro News and Record this morning. Passion for bean dip. It’s what makes the items divers.

I have learned that the piece in the newspaper has provoked passionate disagreement among the pros around town about how’s the best way to make hummus. What could be better than a community-wide discussion of how to make hummus?

“Positivity Resonance” and 10 Virtues for the Modern Age — Law Firm Management 101

UNC professor and positive psychologist Barbara Fredrickson has written a new book that centers on the insight that emotions are not “private events, confined to one person’s mind and skin.” Instead, as between two people, “your respective neural firings come to mirror one another.” When the mirrored emotion is love, the neural firings are positive, and

Barbara Fredrickson

Barbara Fredrickson

a biological wave of good feeling and mutual care that rolls through two or more brains and bodies at once. Your body needs these micro-moments of positivity resonance just like it needs good food and physical activity.

Our latest evidence tells us that micro-moments of positivity resonance fortify the connection between your brain and your heart, making you healthier day-by-day.  Decades of research has shown that people who are more socially connected live longer and healthier lives.

Dr. Fredrickson’s new book is Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do, and Become.

Fredrickson is focused on love. That’s where the money is. But her core points are Law Firm Management 101: Emotions are not private events. Emotions in one person resonate in those around them. Positive emotions resonate to better effect than negative ones. (We need an endowed professor and a research program for this?)

In a moment of cosmic synchronicity, another positive thinker, Alain de Botton, has published Ten Virtues for the Modern Age coincidentally with Love 2.0.   And de Botton’s  ten virtues read to me like a list of qualities needed by members of law firms in order to generate and sustain positivity resonance.

Here’s the list. You can go over to Botton’s School of Life for the commentary. school_of_life

  1. Resilience
  2. Empathy
  3. Patience
  4. Sacrifice
  5. Politeness
  6. Humor
  7. Self-awareness
  8. Forgiveness
  9. Hope
  10. Confidence.

For your practical exercise, please answer these questions:

  • What needs to be added to this list to make it more relevant to law firms? Or, taken away?
  • Can a law firm hire for these qualities?
  • Can a law firm train for these qualities? If so, how?

Nice phrase that. Positivity resonance.

Skills from the Past, for the Future — Lawyers and People

A while back, Pat Bassett, surveyed the current thinking among educators about “the skills and values that will be necessary for students to succeed and prosper in [the] turbulent and ever-changing times” of the 21st Century.

He concluded at the time that there was remarkable agreement that those skills are

  • character (self-discipline, empathy, integrity, resilience, and courage);
  • creativity and entrepreneurial spirit;                                                                                 collaboration
  • real-world problem-solving (filtering, analysis, and synthesis);
  • public speaking/communications;
  • teaming; and
  • leadership.

In The Global Achievement Gap, Tony Wagner identifies “seven survival skills” for the 21st Century.They are:

  1. critical thinking and problem-solving;
  2. collaboration across networks and leading by influence;
  3. agility and adaptability;
  4. initiative and entrepreneurialism;
  5. effective oral and written communication;
  6. access and analyzing information;
  7. curiosity and imagination.

When I was reminded of these sources recently and looked back at them (there’s a Howard Gardner book as well, with the terrific title “Five Minds for the Future”), I was struck by how often these same skills are coming up now in discussions about law practice. The recent spate of commentary by Richard Susskind, Bruce MacEwen and Jordan Furlong covers much the same ground.

Most recently – in fact, hot off the presses – is the paper I wrote for UNC Festival of Legal Learning. In that paper, I looked at North Carolina lawyers in the 19th Century; drew conclusions about attributes they shared; and observed that the “turbulent and ever-changing times” of the 19th Century serve as a “distant mirror” for the turbulent and changing times of the 21st Century. Then (in that paper), I used the attributes of those 19th Century lawyers as the basis for suggesting management principles applicable to 21st Century lawyers and law firms.

Mirabile dictu, the same basic set of skills came up yet again (in an only slightly different form).

(The Winslow paper is A Distant Mirror: How 19th Century Lawyers from Guilford and Edgecombe Counties Are Models for the Next Generation of Lawyers & Firms Worldwide.)